FlixChatter Review: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

drstrange-multiversemadness-poster

The sequel of the 2016 Doctor Strange movie is as buzzy as ever. Fans have been hugely anticipating MCU’s 28th film that its ticket pre-sales already beats other popular MCU movies like Captain Marvel, Thor: Ragnarok, and Guardians of the Galaxy.

Well, hardcore fans likely rejoice in seeing more multiverse action, especially those avid comic readers, but casual fans like me are often left scratching my head. Doctor Strange said in Spider-man: No Way Home that ’the multiverse is a concept in which we know frighteningly little’ I can’t agree more with that sentiment. Despite the fact that it has been introduced in the previous series, Loki and What If?, as well as in the recent Spidey movie, I still don’t quite grasp what the multiverse is all about.

drstrange2-giant-octopus

The movie immediately drops you right into the action… Dr Strange and America Chavez (a member of the Young Avengers in the comics) are being chased by a huge monster. Chavez has the power of interdimensional travel, and America is a fitting name given she can open gateways to any world in the multiverse using her star-shaped portals. As the fight ends in a brutal fashion, Strange wakes up and shakes it as being a nightmare… but is it a bad dream or is it an actual occurrence that happens in another universe? When Strange goes to see Wanda seeking her help, that serene-looking field of cherry blossom is perhaps the only calm moment of the whole movie.

drstrange2-cherryblossom

Given his background in the horror genre, Sam Raimi is a natural choice to helm this movie. He’s got a knack for blending giddy humor and genuine terror, which delivers the closest thing to the first MCU horror movie. There are plenty of Raimi’s signature sequences throughout, creepy and spine-chilling, especially towards the end when all hell breaks loose. Parents beware, this movie could be quite terrifying for young kids.

I’m not going to delve much into the plot to avoid spoilers. Most already know that Strange has unlocked the multiverse when he used his spell to wipe everyone’s minds to forget Spider-Man’s identity. The ramification reaches beyond the earth dimension, but across the multiverse. As if traversing through alternate realities isn’t tricky enough, he now must confront a new, ultra-powerful adversary. It reminds me of the line in Batman Begins, ‘you either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain. 

drstrange2-wanda

I suppose it isn’t the first time MCU is dealing with fellow avengers fighting each other, even after they have fought together against a common enemy. In Captain America: Civil War, the perceived ‘enemy’ the Winter Soldier is a figure whose mind has been corrupted/brainwashed to the point that his new identity has overtaken him. That’s pretty much the case here with Wanda, who’s overcome with grief and anger over her children that get out of hand when her alter ego Scarlet Witch takes over. 

Those who have seen the WandaVision series on Disney+ know just how powerful a sorceress she can be. It actually made me wonder that if Wanda had been able to channel Scarlet Witch’s power during the battle with Thanos, perhaps she alone could’ve helped avoid the whole Snap debacle.

drstrange2-scarletwitch

The main plot focuses on Wanda’s story as much as it is Strange’s. In fact, his own journey takes a bit of a backseat after Wanda’s as well as Chavez, who’s very much learning to embrace her powers and how to control them. I’m totally cool with the ladies being front and center in a Doctor Strange movie. Elizabeth Olsen has done a marvelous job of portraying the complex Wanda/Scarlet Witch dueling persona. It’s a multi-layered role that allows her to run the gamut of emotions within a single movie. While at times I feel her line delivery feels overdone, she manages to give emotional depth to her role while also portraying one of the scariest characters in the MCU. Heck, you could say she could be more frightening than even Thanos, indeed hell hath no fury as a woman scorned!

Newcomer Xochitl Gómez is quite impressive here as one of the core characters in the movie. She has plenty. Of scenes with Cumberbatch and proven herself to be quite a fun match for him in both the comic and dramatic scenes. I know her character is quite significant to the LGBT community but I think she also has the chops to thrive amongst other strong female MCU characters. As for Rachel McAdams, I actually find her more memorable here than her first outing as Dr. Strange’s love interest Christine in the first movie.

drstrange2-america-chavez

Cumberbatch has more than settled in his role as the protagonist, having played the role in five different movies previously. He’s a reliable actor who can balance drama and comedy quite seamlessly. Here Strange serves a kind of like a referee in the fight between Scarlet Witch and Chavez, and a mentor/protector to the latter. Strange has grown wiser and less cocky than when we first saw him, certainly, the events in Avengers Endgame have a profound effect on him. Still, he’s not without the sarcastic wit and playful curmudgeon attitude that Raimi puts to good use. I’ve always enjoyed the banter between Strange and Wong (Benedict Wong) who’s now the Sorcerer Supreme, and I’m glad to see Wong got a bit more screen time.

There have been some leaks about various cameos, some are posted on social media. Thankfully I’ve managed to dodge them all so I was quite surprised to see some of the members of the Illuminati. A fan favorite from Raimi’s popular horror franchise also makes an appearance, and that’s all I’m going to say about that.

drstrange2-wong

Whether or not you’ll enjoy the movie depends on how you feel about the whole multiverse concept. I personally am not a huge fan of multiverse per se, as I prefer my superhero movies to be more ‘grounded’ in reality like Captain America: Winter Soldier which feels more like a spy thriller than a comic-book movie. I think the multiverse concept naturally lends itself to something more uncanny and bizarre, which is not bad per se, I’m just not as fond of it. I equate this concept to the whole time-travel thing, which can be wonderfully intriguing under capable hands but can be a huge mess otherwise. I wouldn’t say Multiverse of Madness is a mess, but it certainly can be maddening. 

For a movie featuring mystical beings spinning orange sparks, it sure takes its time spinning its wheels with far too many bombastic action sequences and too many gross-looking CGI monsters for my liking. We’ve already been subjected to an extended opening chase/fight scene with a huge mythical creature in one dimension, but not too long afterward, a giant, one-eyed octopus monster breaks through the current dimension Strange is living in and wreaking havoc. The problem with fantastical films where people can be thrown about violently without ever getting seriously hurt is that it numbs you out and drained you out. I find my mind wandering a few times while watching all the dizzying action.

drstrange2-still

On top of all that, I have no predilection for sorcery, black magic, and things of demonic nature, hence my aversion to horror movies. I’m not saying I’ve never enjoyed movies dealing with magic, sorcery, or demons, in fact, some of them like The Illusionist, The Lord of the Rings, Crimson Peak, etc. can be very enjoyable. But this Doctor Strange sequel just feels a bit too much for me… so many things hurled at you all at once in maddening speed. So despite some memorable scenes and good performances, this movie isn’t one I’m keen on watching again anytime soon.

2halfReels


So, what are your thoughts on ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness‘?

20 thoughts on “FlixChatter Review: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

  1. I got my ticket for a Sunday screening though I am really getting tired of seeing cam-footage spoilers on YouTube right now. I want to go in not knowing anything.

      1. I did enjoy it and yes, there are flaws. Notably in the script as I thought it was a mess and had too much exposition that I felt kind of dragged the story. I’m still processing my thoughts.

        1. Yeah, too much exposition is right. I think the writer didn’t have much experience, so that’s definitely one of the reasons.

          1. Plus, the writer was known more for his work on Loki. I’m still trying to work on my review as I think it will come out tomorrow/later tonight.

  2. rockerdad

    Thanks for your review Ruth. I’m probably still going to see this in the theater as my son really wants to see it. At least now I will know what to expect.

    1. Hey Vince! I really wanted to love it but given I was rather meh on the first movie, I thought maybe this one would be better. Alas, it was just too jumbled for me and it was hard for me to care for any of the characters.

      1. rockerdad

        I might be one of the few who enjoyed this movie. I actually really liked the first one. Then again, I’ve been reading Marvel and DC comics since the late 70s. So, it could be that this is for diehards like moi. You definitely had to watch and get into WandaVision on Disney+ to really appreciate this one as well. But yeah, I get that this could be too much for some. However, I liked this waaayy more than Spider Man: No Way Home. Go figure…

        1. Hey Vince! I think given you’re more familiar w/ the comics, I’m not surprised you enjoyed this more than I did. Bummer you didn’t like No Way Home though, any particular reason why?

          1. Well I felt that Peter was really to blame for May’s death. I remember thinking why is he doing what he’s doing? You could argue that May’s death is pretty much a mirror image of what happened to Ben. But I had a hard time liking the character after the stupid mistakes he was making. But that is subjective. Bringing in all the old villains felt like a copout as if they couldn’t think of a good adversary for Spiderman. I did enjoy seeing Tobey and Garfield show up but it came up short for me. I loved the previous 2 though.

            1. Hey Vince! Sorry took me forever to reply, I was in Chicago most of last week.

              I hear ya, it is totally Peter’s fault that Aunt May died. I feel like the filmmakers are using that plot to killer her off so they can have that ‘with great power comes great responsibility’ line which is a comics classic.

              I do like the three Spideys together as it gives a chance of redemption to Andrew’s character. The old villains are quite fun for me though the bit with the Lizard is kind of silly. I do prefer Far From Home with Mysterio compared to this one though.

  3. I’m not into this multiverse direction that the MCU are going with either, I’m one of the few people that didn’t really care for SpiderMan: No Way Home. I know that Dr. Strange became more popular ever since he appeared in the last two Avengers films and of course No Way Home. But I hardly remember much about the first film and this one just looked meh to me. I’ll wait till it hits Disney+ to watch it.

    1. I actually like Dr Strange more in the Avengers/Spidey movies than in its own standalone movies. So yeah, if you were meh about the first movie, just wait for it to arrive on streaming.

    1. Yep exactly! I didn’t even know who screenwriter Michael Waldron was but he must’ve gotten the job because of LOKI which ends up being rather meh for me as well though I still love Hiddles.

  4. Pingback: Where does Doctor Strange 2 land on the Banana Meter? | Ripe Banana

  5. Pingback: The Alliance Lately: Issue no. 54 – The Minnesota Film Critics Alliance

  6. Pingback: Belated May 2022 Recap + Movie of the Month – FlixChatter Film Blog

  7. Pingback: FlixChatter Review – THOR: Love and Thunder (2022) – FlixChatter Film Blog

Join the conversation by leaving a comment