
After a year-long delay, Bong Joon-ho’s highly anticipated film has finally reached US theaters. Mickey 17 came six years after Bong’s Oscar-winning film Parasite, a shrewd blend of black comedy, social satire, and Hitchcockian thriller, which stands as one of my top 10 favorite films of 2019.
Set in the not-too-distant tomorrow of 2054, the story is adapted from Edward Ashton’s novel Mickey7, but Bong adds 10 extra Mickeys to kill off, hence the title. The first act is a long exposition that starts four years into Earth’s mission to colonize the snowy planet Niflheim. The first Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattinson) we see is the 17th iteration, left for dead in an icy cavern by Timo (Steven Yeun). Mickey has resigned to his fate that he’d be eaten alive by these wormy, pillbug-like creatures native to Niflheim, referred to as creepers.

Pattinson’s narration fills us in on how he got to this point. It turns out that Mickey and Timo were buddies back on Earth, trying to escape a murderous loan shark. To get away, they made a snap decision to join a space mission. While Timo aimed to be a pilot, Mickey ended up signing up as an ‘expendable’ without reading the fine print. Not to be confused with the violent mercenary group led by Sly Stalone, though being the only disposable crew member on a spaceship proves to be much more deadly.
Mickey gets sent on dangerous missions, and after he dies, a massive ‘human printer’ that resembles an MRI machine brings him back to life. The scientists have figured out a way to keep his memories intact, so he doesn’t forget everything when he’s cloned. That means he remembers all the horrific things he went through, from battling deadly viruses and facing radiation to being tossed into the incinerator while he was still breathing. As if that weren’t horrible enough, he’s constantly being asked by fellow crew members, ‘What does it feel like to die?’

Pattinson really nails the role of a down-and-out guy, ditching the matinee idol charm that I forgot while watching the film that he recently played in The Batman. Plus, he puts on a quirky accent that reminds me of Steve Buscemi’s Randall from Pixar’s Monsters, Inc. He totally embraces his comedic skills and goes for broke for Bong’s wild and wacky concepts. When the creepers let Mickey go without taking a single bite, he laments if his poor body has been used up too many times to be tasty. “I’m still good meat!” He yelps as he walks back to the ship. He hopes to find rest but finds another Mickey in his bed, and Mickey 18 is far more aggressive. As it turns out, despite having the same memory, science can’t exactly replicate a human’s personality.

Bong packs the movie with plenty of themes to ruminate on and mixes various genres that don’t always mesh perfectly. I’d imagine the pitch to the studio went like this… ‘It’s Bond’s Moonraker meets Groundhog Day meets Multiplicity with Starship Troopers thrown in for good measure.’ When Marshall declares his plans to create ‘a pure white planet full of superior people’ at the expense of its native inhabitants he refers to as ‘croissants dipped in s***’, I immediately thought he’s akin to Bond villain Drax from Moonraker masquerading as a televangelist.
I haven’t checked out the book that inspired the movie, so I can’t really say how true it is to the source material. What I can say is that it’s pretty entertaining overall, especially whenever Pattinson is on screen. Watching him portray two very different versions of Mickey is such a hoot. The supporting cast is a bit of a mixed bag, however. Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette resort to broad caricatures as egomaniacal politician Kenneth Marshall and his dominant, sauce-obsessed wife, Ylfa. Wearing false teeth, his hand gestures and the way he moves his mouth are obviously a parody of Donald Trump that seems more fitting for an SNL skit.

Everyone is quick to say that Ruffalo’s character is modeled after Trump, despite Bong saying that his inspiration for Marshall is “a mix of many different politicians and dictators that we have seen throughout history.” Marshall and Ylfa work together as a couple, and Bong said they’re inspired by the Ceaușescu couple from Romania and the Marcos couple from the Philippines.
In any case, Ruffalo’s interpretation of Marshall is more annoying than threatening. Yes we’re supposed to abhor his buffoonish character, but Ruffalo’s exaggerated take on him is too much. Collette is usually pitch perfect, but Ylfa is just as over-the-top, and she cranks up her nastiness even more towards the end. Naomi Ackie is quite memorable here as Mickey’s love interest, Nasha. Their playful scenes are sweet, though I wouldn’t exactly call Mickey 17 a romance, not even a romantic sci-fi. Nasha is delighted the moment she realizes she could double the fun with two Mickeys, but ‘Multiples’ are outlawed by Marshall.
Bong is celebrated for finding humor in horror, but the tonal shift during the third act—from a quirky tragicomedy to a political, anti-colonialism revolt—feels quite jarring. Nasha’s speech, where she stands up for the creepers and tells the Marshalls that ‘WE (the humans) are the aliens’ taking over someone else’s territory, feels a bit too on-the-nose. I never like being lectured in the movies, even if she’s ‘preaching to the choir,’ so to speak.

This is an ambitious project, armed with a lofty budget of $118 million, courtesy of Warner Bros. That’s more than double the combined budget of Parasite and Snowpiercer, proving that a bigger budget doesn’t automatically yield better results. The movie has a distinct dystopian sci-fi vibe, thanks to the bleak industrial design created by production designer Fiona Crombie. Darius Khondji‘s cinematography is evocative and looks grand on the big screen, but it doesn’t quite leave the same lasting impression as his previous works, i.e., Midnight in Paris or The Lost City of Z.
Suffice it to say, I liked the first half way more than the second. When it comes to blending dark humor, social commentary, and sci-fi, Bong Joon-ho usually nails it. However, this time around, he doesn’t quite hit the mark. I wouldn’t call Mickey 17 tedious, but I did start to lose interest as we approached the final act. It’s far from being the worst movie of the year, but I can’t see it making it onto my favorites list.

Have you seen Mickey 17? Let me know what you think!
///
I think I liked this a lot more than you did. I was laughing my ass off throughout the film. I loved what Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette did as it was obvious they were aiming for something that is camp. They are imbeciles as that is the point of their characters. I loved Ackie’s speech in the end as she said the things I’m sure we want to say to our leaders as I just learned that our real president is Vladimir Putin and Elon Musk is the Vice President which makes Dookie Tank the puppet.
I read that Robert Pattinson based his performance on Ren & Stimpy as that makes it even funnier. YOU VEEDIOT!!!!
I laughed quite a bit as well, Pattinson is a hoot and he’s entertaining here. I’m not fond of Ruffalo’s performance, just too hammy and off-putting. We’re supposed to hate his character, not his performance. But then again I wasn’t fond of him in Poor Things either (he shouldn’t have been nominated IMO). I agree with what Nasha is saying, as I said in my review, she was preaching to the choir, but still, I do not like being preached at in movies.
Not familiar w/ Ren & Stimpy but he said he was also inspired by Steve Buscemi’s “Fargo” character for his accent. No wonder, I thought he sounds like Buscemi in Monsters, Inc too.
He said Randall from Monsters Inc. is also one of his inspiration.
I was just watching Randall scenes yesterday and Pattinson’s accent is uncanny!
I agree with a lot of what you wrote here. Pattison’s performance, Joon-Ho’s unorthodox direction and the beautiful cinematography made the film watchable. The story was all over the place though, is as if Joonn-ho wanted to cover all of the isms in the world and got too preachy as usual like some of his other movies. Ruffalo was a total mis-cast here as the Trump stand-in. I don’t care what Joon-ho said, he’s making fun of Trump and his followers, especially there’s a scene of idiots wearing a red head who worshipped the character.
Just like other filmmakers who ages, Joon-ho is basically recycle his style of filmmaking. He just combined three of his other films, The Host, Okja and Snowpiercer into this movie. Some of it worked but many didn’t. But I still enjoyed the heck out of it since it’s my first time back in Dolby Cinema in several months!
So yeah, overall there are things I enjoy but it falls short of the greatness of his Oscar-winning film. Still it was entertaining and I’m glad I saw it on the big screen. Plus it was free, as I still got a gift card from Alamo from before it was bought out by SONY.
So you said The Host is a good one right, I might check that out. I was gonna watch Okja after Parasite but never got around to it somehow.
I wasn’t a big fan of The Host when I first saw it back on 2006. Similar to this movie, he was critical of the politics at the time, the movie was critical of both the American’s and South Korean’s policies. I understood why he was critical of American’s politics back in the mid 2000s but I didn’t know much about S. Korean’s politics so a lot of stuff went over my head.
I recently watched it again and enjoyed it more. The Host was a big hit for foreign a movie at the time and introduces western audiences to Joon-ho. I still prefer his smaller scale films, Memories of Murder, Mother and Parasite are still his best films. Snowpiercer was very good too, I gave it a rave review when I wrote the the review for here back in 2014. But I haven’t seen it since, maybe I might change my mind if I see it again today. Lol!
Memories of Murder sounds intriguing, I like crime noir! I like Snowpiercer when I first saw it too but not something I wanna see again.
I’m actually very surprised that both Memories of Murder and Mother didn’t get a American remake during the Hollywood remake craze of the 2000s and 2010s. Especially, Mother, that one was almost as well praised in the West as The Host when it came out in 2009. I thought someone like Meryl Streep would be the lead in the eventual American remake and I thought George Clooney or Brad Pitt would lead Memories of Murder in the remake. It never happened and I assume Joon-ho didn’t sell the remake rights to Hollywood.
But yes, if you can find Memories of Murder streaming somewhere, I highly recommend it and follow that with Mother. Both are excellent crime thrillers.
Pingback: The Minnesota Movie Digest: Issue No. 132 – The Minnesota Film Critics Association
Interesting review, Ruth.
I hate when the second half of a movie doesn’t live up to the first half.
Too many of those around. Still it sounds worth a funny watch.
Hey, Ruffalo’s trump character might be clownish for the movie, but it might be the character many remember most.(Due to current happenings)
Maybe he can get to host SNL, as the character, of course.
I think some films have great buildup but somehow just don’t stick the landing, and this is one of them. Still it was entertaining thanks to Pattinson’s performance.
Yeah I think people’s hatred for Trump will make the character memorable, but I find his over-the-top antics irksome. I dunno, I haven’t been all that impressed w/ Ruffalo much, I find him overrated. I mean, I actually think Sebastian Stan’s performance as Trump himself (younger version) in The Apprentice is brilliant, though it’s not the kind of movie I ever want to see again.
Understood, on both trumps.
I know it’s not fair, but it will be awhile ’til I watch a movie with Sebastian Stan in it.
There’s many movies I think are amazing, but I will never watch again.
IE: “The Pawnbroker” xx
Pingback: FlixChatter’s MARCH 2025 Viewing Recap + Mini Reviews of NOSFERATU & BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN + Movie of the Month – FLIXCHATTER FILM BLOG