FlixChatter Review: How To Train Your Dragon (2025) – This live-action adaptation delivers a fun ride but can’t quite capture the magic of the animated original

How To Train Your Dragon 2025

The first How To Train Your Dragon animated movie was released 15 years ago. When Universal announced they were going to make a live-action version, I immediately rolled my eyes. I’m just over studios rehashing the same stories, similar to what Disney does with its endless stream of live-action films based on animated classics. They know it’s a lucrative endeavor, as the latest Lilo & Stitch movie will soon enter the billion-dollar club.

Yet I’m curious to see this one because the original filmmaker, Dean DeBlois, is back at the helm. The way he talks about the project makes it seem this is more than just a cash grab, but a desire to bring this story, which was based on a book by British author Cressida Cowell, to a new audience in a new way. I’m thrilled that John Powell is back scoring this version because the music of HTTYD is one of the biggest strengths of the entire franchise.

The story is pretty much identical to the original: A hapless young Viking named Hiccup dreams of hunting dragons and lives up to his island chief father’s expectations, but ends up becoming friends with a young dragon, discovering that there’s more to these creatures than what he’s been made to believe. Hiccup and Toothless’s bond is still the highlight of this film. The ‘forbidden friendship’ scene where Toothless lets Hiccup touch his face still makes me teary-eyed, though the animated version is even more emotional as there’s that element of surprise.

HTTYD - Toothless and Hiccup

Comparison image of the animated and the live-action version

The same with the flying scene. I was completely awestruck by it in the animated version, but that feeling of amazement just doesn’t hit the same here. Don’t get me wrong, the visual effects are fantastic, and the music still gives me the feels. Still, that’s the thing with remakes; no matter how meticulously crafted they are, they often struggle to capture the magic of the original. At times, I also miss Jay Baruchel’s unique voice that I always connect with Hiccup, though overall, Mason Thames is great in the role. 

HTTYD 2025 - Stoick

I do have to commend the artistry in bringing the world of Berk to live. The creature design and puppetry of the dragons, particularly Toothless, are fantastic. His expressive eyes, cat-like growl, etc., are intact. If Toothless lacks the adorable quality of the original, that could make or break this adaptation. The world-building is phenomenal–stunning, the set pieces, Vikings-era costumes are captured beautifully by Oscar-winning DP Bill Pope. There are some truly stunning shots of the lush forest and rocky cliffs, filmed on location in Northern Ireland, Iceland, and the Faroe Islands.

HTTYD 2025 - Hiccup and Toothless

They also did a great job casting-wise. I initially thought Thames is too handsome to play Hiccup, but they made him dorky with that haircut. Thames also gets the awkward mannerism down pat, and he’s able to convey his vulnerability, that sense of desperation to belong and to please his father. Gerard Butler IS Stoick, the animated character was already designed to look like him, so he’s naturally perfect for the role. He’s the only returning character, while his bestie Gobber is now played by Nick Frost. I like Nico Parker as Astrid, though the animated version definitely has more spunk.

HTTYD 2025 - Astrid and Hiccup

While the movie is essentially a shot-for-shot remake, it does add and expand a couple of scenes. One notable one is when Stoick gives a speech following a dragon attack and introduces a few key residents of Berk from different parts of the world (featuring actors from Asian and African ethnicities). They also removed a few, and I wish they hadn’t removed the scene where Hiccup and Toothless chill on a small island and he feeds and cuddles a few small dragons. The line ‘everything we know about you guys is wrong’ is absent here, which marks a significant change in Hiccup’s perspective. I’m glad the line ‘thanks for nothing, you useless reptile’ is still there, but for some reason, the delivery just doesn’t hit the same way.

I missed seeing the 2010 original on the big screen, and I’m still bummed about that. I did see the sequels and this new adaptation in the theater, but none of them match the sense of wonder of the first one, which I gave a perfect 5/5 score. The animated version never overstays its welcome, while this version feels overlong at 125 minutes. That said, this is certainly one of the top live-action adaptations, created with a lot of passion and real love for the original material. Powell’s iconic score still soars, making it a fun ride for franchise fans, while also attracting new ones.

3.5/5 Reels


What do you think of the How To Train Your Dragon franchise?

15 thoughts on “FlixChatter Review: How To Train Your Dragon (2025) – This live-action adaptation delivers a fun ride but can’t quite capture the magic of the animated original

  1. My nephew is watching the animated version right now on MAX. I’d rather stick with the original animation and hopefully catch up on the other 2 films.

    1. Good plan! You should definitely watch the original as it’s so much better. I like the sequels too, I mean, Cate Blanchett is in the 2nd and 3 movies!

        1. This one was shot for IMAX I believe. I don’t know if the animated sequels are gonna be re-released in the theaters, but if they are, they might come to IMAX.

  2. Ted Saydalavong's avatar Ted Saydalavong

    I’ve never seen the original animated version and I can’t believe it’s been 15 years since it came out! I don’t know if I’ll see this one either, it kind of went under the radar, I didn’t know it’s opening this weekend until I see your review of it here. It seems the studio didn’t want to promote it that much. And as much as they want to say this isn’t a cash grab, it is and they all are liars for saying it isn’t. Lol!

    1. Ahahaha, yeah I suppose cash-grabbing is always a factor in remakes, but I feel that Dean Deblois REALLY love this story, so it feels personal to him. There’s so much passion poured into this, unlike the seemingly random way Disney does their live-action remakes. You should check out the animated original, the score alone would make it worth a watch!

    1. Ahah, well if you read my review, I never said I didn’t like it, it’s just that it didn’t reach the heights of the original version, which I’m in love with even 15 years later.

      1. i DID read your review.. You definitely didn’t love it like I did. You don’t say you hated it no…but you didn’t like it as much.. so I didn’t add that on to my sentence.. my faux paux. sorry.

        1. Oh not a faux pas… I was just clarifying that while I didn’t love it as the original, there are still plenty that works here to make it one of the top live-action adaptations (better than most Disney stuff, esp. Snow White, ugh!) I guess I love the animated version so much, which I have seen repeatedly. But hey, the score by John Powell is still amazing!

          Hope you’re well, Peggy!

    1. I love the original too, it still can’t be beat. This one did hit the right notes but yet still can’t quite capture the magic of the original.

  3. Pingback: The Minnesota Movie Digest: Issue No. 145 – Minnesota Film Critics Association

  4. So, Ruth, if you hadn’t see the animated version, would you have enjoyed this more than you did? Would it have been more magical?

    I ask because I have not seen the original animated film.

    I know….. remakes! ????? We have spoken of this before. xoxo

  5. Pingback: FlixChatter’s JUNE Viewing Recap + Top 5 Movies of the First Half of 2025 – FLIXCHATTER FILM BLOG

Leave a reply to Silver Screenings Cancel reply