Easter Special Review: The King of Kings (2025) – The story of Jesus is narrated through the lens of Charles Dickens in this star-studded animated feature

The King of Kings - Angel Studios

The story of Christ has been told cinematically countless times, though in terms of feature animation, this is the first one I’ve seen so far. Created by South Korea’s Mofac Animation and later acquired by Angel Studios for US distribution, what’s unusual about this one is that it’s got Charles Dickens in it. Apparently, the renowned English novelist wrote The Life of Our Lord for his young children, and it was published posthumously. In this way, Dickens acts as a storytelling framework to narrate the tale of our Lord.

The story kicks off with the author, voiced by Kenneth Branagh, presenting his recently released A Christmas Carol on a stage in Victorian London. He soon gets sidetracked by his young son Walter (Roman Griffin Davis), who is busy putting on his own play as his cherished King Arthur backstage, with a little help from his chubby cat Willa. After a serious conversation with the mischievous boy, his wife Catherine (Uma Thurman) encourages Dickens to pull Walter away from a tale of Arthurian Legend by enticing him with a tale about an even greater king: the King of Kings, that is, Jesus Christ.

The King of Kings - Walter Dickens and cat

The film shifts back 2000 years to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, showcasing significant moments such as His baptism, the temptations He faced in the desert, the calling of His disciples, various healings, miracles, and His ultimate sacrifice. This marks the directorial debut of VFX supervisor Seong-ho Jang, and the lighting and water effects are quite beautiful. I especially love the scene of Jesus’ baptism. Released right before Holy Week, it also features the Last Supper, His trial, crucifixion, and ascension.

The script is written by Jang, Jamie Thomason, and Rob Edwards. There’s a lot to fit into just 1 hour and 40 minutes, so the Gospel is presented through a series of quick vignettes, showcasing about a dozen of the most well-known stories in a fast-paced way. It’s tough for these stories to resonate deeply, particularly because the filmmakers blend Charles, Walter (and the cat!) into the narrative of Jesus, even having them interact with Biblical characters. At one point, the cat is even held by Jesus himself! Just as we start to let a miraculous story sink in, Charles jumps in to clarify things when Walter gets a bit lost.

The King of Kings - Jesus and cat

Clearly this movie is aimed at young children, though I’m not sure if this ‘meta’ surrealistic style is effective in getting the message across. Perhaps kids would enjoy the cute character design, but it leaves much to be desired for adult viewers. The characters look like bobbleheads or Funko Pops with oversized heads, and while some facial features are more detailed than others, many suffer from a “dead-eye” look, giving them a soulless appearance. I suppose I can’t expect the same quality of animation as high-budget Disney/Pixar movies, or Dreamworks’ The Prince of Egypt in 1998, which is still the best faith-based animated film to date. I think it boils down to the character design itself, as generally the rendering effects of the Biblical setting are quite striking.

The King of Kings - Jesus washes a disciple' feet

My biggest issue is the portrayal of Jesus, which plays into the same stereotype of featuring the Jewish savior as blonde and blue-eyed Caucasian, much like Jeffrey Hunter in King of Kings (1961) or Max von Sydow in The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965). He has a slim nose and smooth, straight hair, while the other Jewish characters have darker skin tone and more prominent features. It’s a bit strange, especially since Jesus is voiced by Guatemalan-born Oscar Isaac. I also wish the filmmakers would refrain from adding modern touches to the dialogue, such as in the scene when people are ready to throw stones at the woman caught having an affair. Jesus famously intervened and said, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” The movie added ‘Go ahead, I’ll wait,’ a famous meme on social media right now (cue eye roll). On the bright side, Isaac’s voice carries a calm yet commanding presence that fits the image of the Savior.

The one thing most people would remember about this one is likely the stellar voice cast. I wonder how they manage to get such a star-studded ensemble: Ben Kingsley as Caiaphas, Forest Whitaker as Peter, Pierce Brosnan as Pontius Pilate, Jim Cummings as Pharisee Hillel, and Mark Hamill, who repurposed some of his Joker voice as King Herod.

The King of Kings - Jesus' Ascension

In addition to the Gospel, the movie also features a simplified version of the Adam and Eve story, presented in different animation styles that have a hand-drawn, sketchy look. I appreciate that the movie embraces its deep spiritual themes, showcasing moments like Jesus’ anguish in Gethsemane and the touching scene of Him washing His disciples’ feet. I was a bit taken aback by the inclusion of the flogging scene, but they handle it sensitively by covering Jesus with a post and blurring the more graphic parts during the crucifixion. I wish that the movie elaborated more on the Ascension scene. After all, the core of Christianity is centered around Jesus’ resurrection, where he conquered death to free humanity from the bondage of sin.

As far as an introduction to young kids to Jesus and the importance of faith, I think this movie does a serviceable job. I believe the creators genuinely care and handle Jesus’ story with the respect and reverence it deserves. Despite its flaws that I’ve highlighted above, The King of Kings has the power to inspire future movie audiences with its enduring themes of redemption, grace, and forgiveness.

3/5 Reels


Happy Easter! Thoughts on this movie? I’d love to hear what you think!

///

15 thoughts on “Easter Special Review: The King of Kings (2025) – The story of Jesus is narrated through the lens of Charles Dickens in this star-studded animated feature

  1. I have no interest in this. I don’t like what Angel Studios is about as I am not fond of faith-based films.

    However, I did see Sinners earlier today (review coming tomorrow or Monday) and… oh…. we got a contender.

    1. I realize you don’t care for Angel Studios, heard that many times from you. I do think every film ought to be judged for its own merit and this is not created by Angel Studios, it’s by a South Korean company, they only act as a distributor.

  2. Ted Saydalavong's avatar Ted Saydalavong

    I’ve never heard of this movie before, not something I would see. But I’m surprised at how many well known actors were involved in voicing the characters in the movie!

  3. Pingback: The Minnesota Movie Digest: Issue No. 137 – The Minnesota Film Critics Association

  4. Not something I would watch.

    I do appreciate your candor on this review, and that it is serviceable for young children.

    Also interesting is that I am reading this on the day the Pope has passed away. Much to say there; another time.

    I don’t watch the classic faith based movies any more, as I know the stories better than my hand.

    However, I do know that Ben Hur is a fave, if not your fave. Last night the 1925 Silent Movie version of Ben Hur was on. Full title: Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ.

    Ramon Navarro starred as Ben Hur.

    I’m glad I watched it (because of you) as I was amazed by much of the costumes, sets, and cinematography. They also had a number of short but important scenes that were in colour. They were painted in by hand, no less.

    Thank you so much, Ruth, and Happy Easter Monday!

    1. Yeah, it’s definitely geared for young kids who likely delight in seeing the kid Walter and the pudgy cat wander in Biblical times, even encountering Jesus himself! It’s like a CliffNotes version of the Gospel, but I think it’s pretty good as a children’s intro to the power of faith.

      Oh I LOVE Ben-Hur, the 1959 version by William Wyler was one that my late mother introduced me to and it’s still one of the most amazing films I’ve ever seen. That chariot race alone is astounding, still unrivaled to this day. Even the ghastly remake in 2016 (which should NOT have been made) couldn’t match it even with modern technology. I love how they handled the inclusion of Christ without showing his face, but you only see the reaction of the Roman guard when he encountered him. Absolutely brilliant!

      I really should watch the 1925 version! So they used the full title of the book by General Lew Wallace, the 1959 version uses ‘A Tale of the Christ’ as a tagline in the poster.

      1. Yes, they used the full title of the book.

        Interesting that the 1959 film only had it as a tag line. It is an amazing film, and I can still see the chariot race. I’ve seen it a few times, and will watch it again one day.

        I can’t bring myself to watch the 2016 remake.
        It would be like watching a remake of “Gone With the Wind”.
        Really??? You think you can improve on perfection?
        There are a bunch of films that fall into this category. IMO

        1. Hello again Resa! Yeah, don’t bother to watch the Ben-Hur remake, it’s awful though I actually don’t mind Jack Huston, he’s a decent actor.

          Exactly, they thought they could improve on perfection, sheesh!! I think a lot of Hollywood classics fall into this category that should NOT ever be remade: Casablanca, Roman Holiday, My Fair Lady, Lawrence of Arabia, just to name a few!

      1. Mwahaha!! I was thinking the same thing after I read he’s one of the last people to see the Pope 😬 I do not follow Catholic teachings though I was raised that way (I am still very much a believer in Christ as the Living God though), I find the whole papacy thing extremely problematic and unbiblical, but sounds like Francis was a good human. May he rest in peace 🙏🏽

Leave a reply to Resa Cancel reply