FlixChatter Review – Bad Boys For Life (2020)

The original script of Bad Boys was written for Dana Carvey and Jon Lovitz, for the youngsters out there, Carvey and Lovitz were quite popular comedians back in the 80s and 90s. Surprisingly, both actors weren’t interested and with the rise of hip hop music in the 90s, the script was rewritten for then young and hip comedians, Martin Lawrence and Will Smith. Producers Jerry Bruckheimer and the late Don Simpson were in a time crunch, they needed to turn the script into production in just a few months or Sony was going to pull the plug on the project. Most well-known directors at the time weren’t interested in directing the film, so they decided to hire an unknown music director by the name of Michael Bay. The film opened in the spring of 1995 and it’s a big hit considering its very small budget of about $20mil. Personally, I thought the series was going to have like 6 or 7 sequels by now, but a sequel didn’t come out until 2003 and now we’re finally getting a third sequel.

As the film opens, Det. Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence) became a grandfather while his partner Det. Mike Lowrey (Will Smith) still enjoy living the single life. Unbeknownst to Mike, Marcus had decided to retire from the Miami PD. He’s trying to convince Mike to settle down, get marry and have children. But Mike still considers himself the cool cop in Miami and wants to keep taking down the bad guys as long as he could. One night while out celebrating the birth of Marcus’ new grandson, Mike was gunned down by an assassin. The person behind the assassination attempt is Isabel (Kate del Castillo), wife of a deceased drug cartel leader from Mexico. She wants vengeance on those who caused her husband’s demise and Mike happens to be on top of the list. Helping Isabel taking out her enemies is her son Armando (Jacob Scipio).

Joe Pantoliano back as Captain Howard

Of course, Mike survived the attack and after spending six months in recovery, he wants revenge. Hoping his partner would be more than willing to help him track down the assassin but Markus told him he’s retired from the Miami PD and that he can’t be part of the “Bad Boys” team with Mike anymore. Now feeling betrayed and angry, Mike decided to beg his captain Howard (Joe Pantoliano) to let him investigate his own assassination attempt. So Howard decided to let Mike be involve with the AMMO team that’s in charge of the case and Mike needs to follow the order of its leader Rita (Paola Núñez), as it turns out Rita and Mike were once a couple but broke up because Mike’s fear of falling in love. That’s pretty much the set-up of the story, this being a buddy cop action picture, you’ll get the usual car chases and shoot outs.

The screenplay was credited to three writers, Chris Bremner, Peter Craig and Joe Carnahan. Carnahan was actually tapped to direct the picture, he left because of the constant delays in production but still gets credited as a writer. There’s nothing really new in this sequel, instead of having Mike and Markus battling drug dealers like the previous films, this one is more personal to Mike. But the film still contains elements of the last two films. What’s kind of refreshing to me was that the story took its time before unleashing mayhem on screen. Since we’re now living in a more PC world, the gay jokes aren’t there anymore and the racist and sexist jokes have been tone down a bit. With both Smith and Lawrence are now in their 50s, the film contains more old people’s joke than other offensive ones.

I consider BAD BOYS 2 to be one of the worst films of the 2000s. It’s a loud and obnoxious film with no redeeming quality whatsoever. Basically, it’s Michael Bay’s first journey into Bayhem. So, I was glad he decided to not return and direct this one. Taking over the helm are two unknown and untested directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah. While the look and style of the film is very similar to Bay’s, the two directors did tone down the flashy camera works and fast editing that Bay seems to love incorporating into his films.

Unfortunately, both Arbi and Fallah just couldn’t shoot proper action scenes. There were two big set pieces that should have been exiting but they were so badly staged and shot that the scenes looked like some film student actually shot them. Now if the film was a low budget production, then I can give it a pass, but with a reported budget of $90mil, it’s inexcusable to me. I think maybe they should’ve hired Bay just to shoot action scenes. Say what you will about the man, he does know how to set up proper action sequences and make them look exciting on the screen.

The two leads w/ supporting cast Charles Melton, Vanessa Hudgens, Alexander Ludwig, and Paola Núñez

Performances were fine all around. Smith and Lawrence always have a good chemistry, and there are some of their scenes together in the film that made me laugh out loud. In order to attract younger audiences, young actors Vanessa Hudgens, Alexander Ludwig and Charles Melton were part of the action and of course they’re there to make fun of Mike’s and Marcus’ old age.

While I wouldn’t call it the “best” in the series, this three-quel was definitely an improvement over the last film. It’s less mean-spirited and has more laughs. If you’re a fan of the series, then I think you’ll enjoy this one. It’s just a shame that the action scenes were the weakest part of the film.

TedS_post


So have you seen Bad Boys For Life? Well, what did you think?

FlixChatter Review: Death Wish (2018)

I hate using the word “guilty pleasure” when talking about films that I enjoy but I think the old Charles Bronson‘s Death Wish films are definitely my guilty pleasures. Of course, with Hollywood pretty much refusing to make any films that resemble any kind of originality, a remake of the 1974 film was inevitable. The remake was originally going to star and be directed by Sly Stallone, but he left for creative differences. Then Joe Carnahan took over the project but left because he didn’t agree with the studio’s choice of casting Bruce Willis as the lead. The project somehow landed in the hands of, of all people, Eli Roth, whose previous films were all torture porn.

Dr. Paul Kersey (Bruce Willis) is living the good life, he’s got a great job, a big house that he shares with his beautiful wife Lucy (Elizabeth Shue) and daughter Jordan (Camila Morrone). One night while he’s away at work, thieves broke into his house, murdered his wife and left his daughter in a coma. Kersey’s world has now been turned upside down and when the authority couldn’t find his wife’s killers, he decided to turn into a vigilante. I think most movie goers are familiar with either the original film or this kind of story, it’s been told several times before and unfortunately there’s nothing new here in the remake.

Joe Carnahan gets the full credit for the screenplay but apparently Roth and another writer rewrote much of what Carnahan wrote but the screen writers guild gave all the credits to Carnahan. He probably wish his name doesn’t appear in the credits because the story is quite generic. I’ve never read the novel that it’s based on so I don’t know how close it is to the source material.

I’m not a fan of Roth’s work, I don’t find his kind of horror films entertaining. I was skeptical about him doing an action picture and fortunately he did an okay job. He didn’t try to make it into a dark and serious action picture. But he never elevated the material to anything special either, the only thing he added was the extra gore during the action scenes. Also, I don’t think he really knows what kind of picture he wanted to make. Does he support vigilantism or is he against it? A lot of scenes sort of contradict each other.

The performances by the actors were fine, I think Willis tried to add some depth to his character but it didn’t really work. He’s kind of flat on many scenes. His character started out as someone who tried to avoid conflicts but he became John McClane once he lost his family. The only shining performance was Vincent D’Onofrio who played the brother of Kersey and the voice of reason in the story. All of the supporting actors were pretty generic.

At a time where gun control talks are dividing people in this country, this film doesn’t really need to be made. To be fair though, the film was finished way before the mass shootings that happened within the last few months here in the States. For the people don’t like gun violence, you best to stay away from this film. But anyone who like trashy B-action films, then you might enjoy it.

TedS_post


So have you seen Death Wish? Well, what did you think?

From Vision to Film » Mission: Impossible 3

TedSaydalavongBanner

Welcome to the third edition of From Vision to Film series, courtesy of guest blogger Ted Saydalavong (to view the other two posts, click on the category name on the right sidebar). This movie’s been released over four years ago, but news of the fourth sequel being green-lit weeks ago makes this post quite timely. Last week, Screenrant reported that Tom Cruise is taking a salary cut to star. Don’t shed a tear for the megastar just yet though, he’s still getting “… a nice back-end after cash break-even” so if the movie makes money, he’ll still get paid a huge chunk of moolah. Anyway, here’s a history of how the Mission: Impossible: III um, exploded to the big screen:

With huge successes of the first two Mission: Impossible films (the first one made about $180 mil here in the States, while the second made around $215 mil), Paramount was rushing to deliver another installment of the adventure thriller. Not having worked with director David Fincher (Se7en, Fight Club) before, Tom Cruise and Paramount invited him to come on board and develop a storyline for it. Fincher had just finished Panic Room with Jodie Foster and wanted to make an action film, so he agreed to come on board. This was in early 2002, Paramount scheduled M:I:3 for the summer 2004 release.

So while Cruise was filming The Last Samurai in New Zealand, Fincher and his team worked on the script and even story-boarded a few big action sequences for the film. One of the sequences was for the opening scene of the film in which we see an assassin killed some very important person with a sniper rifle and then we see this assassin running away after the kill; as he was running he peeled off his face and we see the main character Ethan Hunt (Cruise). The plot for this version involves some very powerful companies selling human body parts in Africa and the IMF team was assigned to stop them. Tom Cruise even went to South Africa to look for locations before they started filming.

Philip Seymour Hoffman ended up as the villain in M:I:3

Kenneth Branagh was cast as the main villain in this version and Carrie-Ann Moss (Trinity from The Matrix films) was also cast as the new team member and a love interest to Cruise’s character. In early 2003, Fincher delivered the script and described his vision to Cruise and studio executives. First, he told them that he wanted to make a very violent and bloody spy flick and he also envisioned how Ethan Hunt has aged through the years; rumor has it that Cruise was not too happy when he heard this. Well not surprisingly, Cruise and the executives told Fincher that they couldn’t green lit a hard R-rated Mission: Impossible film, which resulted in Fincher leaving the project.

After Fincher left, Cruise hired Joe Carnahan (Smoking Aces, The A-Team), hot off of his debut film Narc (which Cruise put his name on the film as Executive Producer after he saw and loved it). Carnahan decided to keep Fincher’s script but did some minor tweaks to it. He added another character to the film, the young protégé which was supposed to play by Scarlett Johansson but eventually went to Keri Russell in the final version. Carnahan wanted to make the story more geopolitics, which makes sense since the plot took place mostly in Africa. He also wanted to make a violent R-rated film and again the studio refused and a second director walked off the project.

Producer JJ Abrams with the Cruister

So by early 2004 the studio and Cruise were looking for another director to take over the project, apparently Cruise saw an episode of Alias and loved it and decided to offer J.J. Abrams the job. Abrams decided to scrap Fincher’s script and came up with his own version, which in my opinion was quite lame. Out of all three M:I films, I thought the third one was the weakest, no offense to those who love it. Abrams also recast everyone except Cruise and Ving Rhames of course. According to Carnahan, Carrie-Ann Moss had some very cool and complex action scenes in his version, and she had trained for three months or so to prepare for them. Carnahan said he felt bad for her and wished Abrams had kept her in the cast.

When the film finally opened in summer 2006, it didn’t perform as well as the studio had hoped. Now maybe Tom Cruise’s couch-jumping antics might have something to do with it. In any case, the fourth sequel was recently green-lit and scheduled to come out Christmas 2011. Brad Bird (The Incredibles, The Iron Giant, Ratatouille) has signed on to direct, which will mark his live-action directorial debut.

Apparently Abrams again came up with the concept for the fourth one and Cruise loves it. That doesn’t sound promising to me since I didn’t care for the third one. I’m still hoping we’ll get to see Fincher’s version on the big screen someday.


TedS_post


Thoughts on the story? Are you a fan of MI:3?