FlixChatter Review: JUROR #2 (2024) – Clint Eastwood’s engrossing courtroom drama has me feeling torn in all the best ways.

Juror2-movie-poster

I actually heard about this film from reports that Warner Bros had somehow ‘buried’ the film as it was released with minimal fanfare in limited theaters with no plan for expansion. It’s really a bummer not only because it could be 94-year-old Clint Eastwood’s last film, but because it deserves to be seen by more people.

The last Clint Eastwood film I saw was Sully in 2016. With that one, The 15:17 To Paris, Richard Jewell, the 94-year-old has a penchant for retelling extraordinary real-life stories. The plot of Jurors #2 seems to be straight out of a John Grisham novel, but it’s actually based on an original screenplay by Jonathan Abrams.

Juror2-Hoult-Deutch
©Warner Bros

Nicholas Hoult plays a mild-mannered journalist Justin Kemp who gets selected for Jury Duty while his heavily pregnant wife (Zoey Deutch) stays home, anxious about her high-risk pregnancy. The case turns out to be a high-profile murder trial jury of a young man named James Sythe (Gabriel Basso) who faces serious charges for allegedly killing his girlfriend Kendall (Francesca Eastwood) after they fight in a bar. The dead woman’s body was found on the rocky creek below a bridge, the same street Justin recalls he was driving on during a torrential downpour and thought he had hit a deer.

Things are never what they seem in a murder case. It’s soon revealed that Justin is a former alcoholic who might’ve had a relapse when he visits the same bar the night James and Kendall have a fight. At first, Justin’s conscience holds up the jury’s unanimous decision, causing a fiery discussion among the jurors instead of a swift guilty verdict for James. The plot thickens when one of the jurors happens to be a retired detective and Harold (J.K. Simmons) starts to investigate the vehicles that go in for repair around the same time the murder happened. As a fan of murder mystery, I enjoy the whodunit plot deftly interwoven with a legal drama, putting Justin in a tough spot where he has to make a moral decision that could really affect the balance of justice.

Juror2-Collette-Faith
©Warner Bros

Hoult has proven himself once again to be one of the most versatile yet underrated actors of his generation. Despite his good looks, the 34-year-old Brit has managed to avoid being confined to just playing the handsome bloke. Here’s an actor who auditioned for Superman and Batman and could convincingly portray those superhero roles, but he’s currently filming his role as Lex Luthor in James Gunn’s Superman reboot. Such acting versatility is a rare find.

The casting of Toni Collette as prosecutor Faith Killebrew who’s campaigning to be the next District Attorney is an inspired one. Not only is Collette a phenomenal actress, but it’s fun to see her reunite with Hoult two decades after playing his mother in About A Boy in 2002. The Aussie thespian can do any accent convincingly, including a Southern drawl as the story takes place in Savannah, Georgia. This story could’ve been titled The Prosecutor as well as it’s as much about Faith as it is about Justin. Chris Messina is terrific as James’ defense attorney; both Messina and Collette have their moments during the extensive deliberations. Amongst the jury, a few of them stood out: Marcus (Cedric Yarbrough), Keiko (Chikako Fukuyama), and Denice (Leslie Bibb).

Juror2-jury
©Warner Bros

Juror #2 gives a nod to the classic courtroom movies, notably 12 Angry Men, while exploring its own intricate storyline. Compared to flashier courtroom movies like A Few Good Men, Primal Fear, Michael Clayton, etc., Juror #2 is a bit more understated with fewer screaming matches, but it’s just as absorbing. I think the best comparison I can think of is Saint Omer, an equally engrossing French courtroom drama by Alice Diop. The best films in this sub-genre have a strong hook that keeps me guessing about the final verdict. It definitely leaves me pondering the best question to ask after any film: what choices would I make if I were in that position?

Juror2-Collette-Hoult
©Warner Bros

Abrams’ script also offers a potent critique of the flawed American justice system, as exemplified in the conversation between Justin and his sponsor at Alcoholics Anonymous (Kiefer Sutherland). Eastwood creates tension slowly but surely, letting the characters and us viewers take a moment to reflect on just how high the stakes are in this situation. He also ensures the characters remain center stage so they don’t end up playing second fiddle to the legal case. The quieter moments between Justin and his wife really emphasize the immense pressure he’s under, and a brief off-court conversation between Faith and a witness becomes a turning point for her.

This is truly one of the most captivating and thought-provoking stories in Eastwood’s filmmaking career. I hope he’d still be able to develop another film or two, but if this is indeed his swan song, then he’ll end on a high note. It’s a bummer that this film flies under the radar, but it’s definitely worth seeking out.

4/5 stars


What are your thoughts about JUROR #2?

11 thoughts on “FlixChatter Review: JUROR #2 (2024) – Clint Eastwood’s engrossing courtroom drama has me feeling torn in all the best ways.

  1. I do want to see this out of respect for Clint Eastwood as I can’t believe the way its release has been handled by Warner Brothers. You would think after so many years of loyalty, they would’ve done more to market the film and give it a wide release in theaters. It’s bad enough David Zaslav has cancelled several films, gutted Turner Classic Movies, and be all things to be an enemy for cinema. This… I really hope Clint has a gun and shoot that guy in the fucking head right now.

    1. I read an article on Indiewire about WB’s anti-filmmaker reputation https://www.indiewire.com/news/box-office/juror-2-warners-anti-filmmaker-reputation-1235063637/ and I think the writer had a point there. It’s a travesty what they did to such a revered and venerable artist like Eastwood! I can’t stand that Zaslav guy; he’s just terrible and money hungry, ugh! Why does a guy with zero creativity like that get to be the head of a company that’s supposed to champion artists? I’ll never know!

  2. OMG!!!

    I must see this film.

    Love Eastwood, courtroom drama, mystery and everything you’ve mentioned.

    I hope it’s streaming on one of the services I get!

    Thanks for the review, Ruth! This is a MUST see for me.

    94 – wow!

    1. Yes you absolutely should seek this movie out, Resa! I’d say it’s worth seeing on the big screen as well. It’s too bad WB studio didn’t respect this film enough to give it the proper release. Do you get MAX in Canada? It’s supposed to be released there later in December.

      Yeah, I still can’t believe Clint Eastwood is 94, I hope he still gets to do at least 1-2 more films!

  3. Ted Saydalavong's avatar Ted Saydalavong

    I saw the trailer of this one a couple of months ago and I thought it looked good. I’m not surprised though that Warner Bros. isn’t pushing this one out in theaters. Sully was the last successful film that Eastwood made, that’s almost a decade ago and his last few outings were box office and critical duds. Also, this isn’t the type of movie that will make a good return for them at the box office. With the way Warner Bros. has been doing cost cutting lately, I’m surprised that this movie didn’t go directly to Max. But I’ll watch it when it does come out on Max, which will be in about a month or so. Lol!

    1. I think even without the stellar box office receipt, Eastwood still deserves some respect from studios. I actually think it might actually make some good money as counterprogramming for mature audiences who want something other than big blockbusters like Gladiator or Wicked or kiddie movies like Moana 2. The reviews are excellent, so people might be drawn to see it on the big screen. It’s made about $10 mil at the international box office so far, but no official domestic gross figures have been released by the studio, so who knows, maybe it did better than expected.

      1. Ted Saydalavong's avatar Ted Saydalavong

        Even though Eastwood has been royal to Warner Bros. throughout his career, I don’t think anyone who’s currently working at the studio feels the same about him. They went through several acquisitions and I don’t think many of the higher ups care much about Eastwood’s films.

        Another reason for them not pushing it out in theater is that the movie don’t have brand named stars. They can’t promote a non spectacle film without a big star. If this one has someone like DiCaprio, Cruise, Hank or Pitt as the lead, it sure would’ve been playing in many theaters. Also, remember they spent money on a film by another veteran star and director, Costner’s Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1 and it failed so badly at the box office. I think they just don’t want to risk it with this one.

  4. Pingback: FlixChatter’s NOVEMBER viewing recap + Mini Reviews + Movie of the Month – FLIXCHATTER FILM BLOG

  5. Pingback: The Minnesota Movie Digest: Issue No. 117 – The Minnesota Film Critics Association

  6. Pingback: FlixChatter’s Top 10 Films of 2024 + 20 Honorable Mentions – FLIXCHATTER FILM BLOG

Leave a reply to Ted Saydalavong Cancel reply