FlixChatter Review – Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant (2023)

TheCovenant-poster

There have been several films about the war in the Middle East since the war started over two decades ago. Some were good, some were terrible and some were just okay. Guy Ritchie’s latest war film sits right in the middle of that. It isn’t great but not that terrible. The story is not a factual account but more inspired by real events that happened between US soldiers and their interpreters during the War in Afghanistan.

The time is 2018 and we’re following a unit fronted by United States Army Sergeant John Kinley (Jake Gyllenhaal) after it falls victim to a Taliban roadside bomb attack that kills their interpreter. Looking for a potential replacement back at base, the most recommended candidate is Ahmed Abdullah (Dar Salim) who, despite his somewhat questionable reputation for behavioral issues, speaks a dozen languages.

TheCovenant-still

The introduction between Kinsey and Abdullah didn’t get off to a good start but Kinsey is desperate for an interpreter and Abdullah was quickly hired and joined the unit. Now that his unit has a new interpreter, Kinsley, and his men set out to find Taliban camps containing IEDs, which require Ahmeds assistance for communication purposes. They found a remote camp but then were ambushed by the Taliban. Kinsley and Abdullah escaped but Kinsley was shot and in bad condition.

TheCovenant-Gyllenhaal

The film was told in three stages. First, we got to know Kinsley, his men, and Abdullah. Second, was about survival. This was when Salim took over the film and became the sole focus. His determination to survive and keep Kinsley alive was told in a style that you’d see in a Stanley Kubrick’s or Terrence Malick’s film. The last stage is when Kinsley must rescue Abdullah and his family from the Taliban.

TheCovenant-Salim

The screenplay is credited to Richie, Ivan Atkinson, and Marn Davies. The story isn’t anything new when it comes to this genre and Richie told the story in a no-nonsense, straightforward way. The way he shot the movie is very similar to Wrath of Man. Nothing flashy or over the top like his earlier work. What surprised me was that the violence was quite tame compared to other R-rated war films.

The film focused mostly on Gyllenhaal and Salim, and both men did a good job portraying their respective characters. Everyone else in the film was just there for these two actors to interact with.

Now, I’m not the biggest fan of Ritchie. I enjoyed some of his films but he’s too flashy when it comes to storytelling. But I enjoyed this one and if you’re in the mood for a solid war film, you might like this one, too.

3Reels

TedS_post


So have you seen The Covenant? Well, what did you think?

5 thoughts on “FlixChatter Review – Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant (2023)

  1. Randomly during Prime days I bought this movie as it was onsale. All I can say is it’s too bad STX went under and this movie got next to nothing as a push release because it was so good. I was shocked at how good it was and how I was so involved in it and the acting was quite stellar. It won’t be talked about come Oscar time because it has no one to pitch it now – and that’s too bad.

    1. Ted Saydalavong

      Yeah, it’s a shame that the studio funded the film went broke, I didn’t even know it came out theater.

  2. Glad to hear this is a good one, Ted! I’m more inclined to see this when you said this isn’t the typical over-the-top action flick from Ritchie and not as bloody violent as other war movies.

    1. Ted Saydalavong

      This was more of a survival story and the violence and war battles took a back burner. You won’t have any problems with it, Ritchie cut away the more gruesome stuff during violent scenes.

  3. Pingback: FlixChatter Review: The Ministry Of Ungentlemanly Warfare (2024) – the cast is having a blast in Guy Ritchie’s suspense-free action comedy – FLIXCHATTER FILM BLOG

Join the conversation by leaving a comment