Guest Review: SPLIT (2017)


Directed By: M. Night Shyamalan
Written By: M. Night Shyamalan
Runtime: 1 hr 57 minutes

M. Night Shyamalan has struggled over the years to regain his early 2000’s glory. From a movie about trees compelling people commit suicide, to a horrible adaptation of a beloved animated series, several of his more recent films have been flops. His newest movie, however, has been attracting a lot of attention, and people are wondering if it might be a return to the tense, unique thrillers that originally made Shyamalan a household name. Does it deliver? In addition, can a movie with an antagonist whose defining characteristic is a legitimate mental disorder succeed without being offensive or painfully inaccurate?

In Split, three teenage girls (Anya Taylor-Joy as Casey, Haley Lu Richardson as Claire, and Jessica Sula as Marcia) are kidnapped by Kevin (James McAvoy), a man with dissociative identity disorder. Kevin currently has twenty-three personalities who are awaiting the arrival of a new, mysterious one who is simply called The Beast. The girls must figure out which personalities they can trust or manipulate to help them escape.


While this film had its problems, it was still one of the better ones I’ve seen out of Shyamalan in quite a while. It starts out tense and is suspenseful the whole way through; at the risk of sounding cliché, I was on the edge of my seat the whole time, watching the girls’ constant attempts at escape and tense interactions with Kevin’s multiple personalities. James McAvoy gave a fantastic performance, managing to portray nine different personalities without overdoing any of them in an attempt to make them distinct. The actresses playing the kidnapped teenagers gave great performances as well, especially Anya Taylor-Joy as Casey, and hopefully we’ll be seeing more of their work in the future.


That said, this was far from a perfect movie. There were some moments where the tone felt a little confused, and I wasn’t sure if the audience was supposed to laugh or feel unnerved. Much of the exposition comes from Kevin’s psychiatrist, Dr. Fletcher (Betty Buckley), and the way it’s presented is pretty clunky. Then, of course, there is the portrayal of dissociative identity disorder. Is it insensitive or inaccurate? To answer that would spoil Shyamalan’s signature “twist,” so you’ll have to highlight this next part in order to see it [SPOILER ALERT] Based on the climax of the movie, it appears whatever Kevin suffers from isn’t dissociative identity disorder, but some sort of supernatural ability to not only be host to multiple personalities, but to change physically depending on the personality. When The Beast finally makes his appearance, Kevin’s muscles grow and his skin thickens, earning him near invincibility. He can easily climb walls and ceilings and receive multiple gunshots without being taken down. So because the antagonist doesn’t actually have this specific mental disorder, I can’t say it was portrayed insensitively, since technically it wasn’t what was being portrayed at all.

The twist doesn’t come out of nowhere- it’s hinted at during a session between Kevin and Dr. Fletcher- and, for people who are familiar with Shyamalan’s style, one could almost predict it from the plot summary alone (maybe not the exact details, but at least the general idea). As far as accuracy, Dr. Fletcher does discuss her research on physical changes in individuals with DID, some of which sounded pretty far-fetched, but upon further research (Google searches during my lunch break at work), I found that much of what she said in the movie is based on actual DID cases, so at least the little they did include regarding the actual disorder was mostly based in reality.

Split isn’t necessarily a major comeback for Shyamalan, but it’s still an interesting watch, and it’s definitely worth checking out if you want to see a solid acting performance


Have you seen ‘SPLIT’? Well, what did you think? 

14 thoughts on “Guest Review: SPLIT (2017)

  1. I gave up on M. Night years ago, wasted about half hour of my life that I can’t get back by watching a garbage film of his called Lady in the Water, so I’ll probably skipped this one. I actually read a spoiler filled about another “twist” he decided to put in the movie, I won’t say it here but I just went WTF?!!

    1. HAHAHA, I wanted to mention Lady in the Water in my intro, but “a movie with a main character named Story and a bad guy who is a movie critic (because Shyamalan is apparently that petty)” just felt too clunky. 😀 And yeah, I know the other “twist” you’re talking about, but I didn’t want to include it here since A) it’s at the VERY end of the movie and B) I felt like it was more a cameo/nod to diehard Shyamalan fans than a twist, since it didn’t come up at all during the rest of the movie.

      1. Not sure if you ever read the dramas behind the scenes about how Lady In The Water got made. Apparently one of the top Disney executives asked M. Night to fix the script during one of their meetings and Night was so offended that he left Disney and brought the script to Warner Bros. who’s more than eager to finance the film; they’ve been courting to him come work for them for years. Of course their investment didn’t turn out well and M. Night’s career has gone down hill since.

        As for the second “twist” in this film, I totally agree that it’s just a fan service. I prefer to see a direct sequel to that character than a cheap trick like he pulled here.

        1. Yeah, I heard about that! Pretty ridiculous. And exactly! If he wanted to make a sequel, he should have just made a straight-up sequel. As it is, it can hardly be considered a twist (at least in relation to this movie), especially if anyone watching this movie has never seen the one related to the cameo.

  2. Hey Laura, great review! I managed to avoid reading the spoiler though you had emailed the whole thing to me, ahah. I might rent this one though the subject matter didn’t appeal to me much. I do love McAvoy who I knew could tackle such a difficult task of playing this character, plus I have met Haley Lu Richardson when she came to TCFF a couple of years ago. She’s super sweet and so talented!

    1. Haha, oh, good! I’m glad you were able to avoid the spoiler when you put this up for me! Yeah, I’d say rent it for sure, just for McAvoy’s performance. Haley Lu (along with the other girls) was fantastic as well!

    1. Thank you so much, Shivani! It’s definitely an interesting plot, and James McAvoy REALLY nails the role. In the wrong hands, it could have been so campy and the switches between the personalities could have been over-exaggerated, but McAvoy does such an incredible job.

  3. Pingback: FlixChatter Review – Atomic Blonde (2017) – FlixChatter Film Blog

  4. Pingback: FlixChatter Review: GLASS (2018) – FlixChatter Film Blog

Join the conversation by leaving a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s