Guest Post: Elysium, Her & The Nature of Science Fiction

Special thanks to Conor Holt for this post. Stay tuned for my full review of Spike Jonze’s her coming this weekend!


Well, this is awkward. Science Fiction is my favorite film genre, but in 2013 one of my favorite films of the year and my least favorite film of the year…are both Science-Fiction. How could this happen?

Well, let’s go back to the Science Fiction Genre. The Science-Fiction genre is one of the more difficult genres to define, since it lacks the same visual iconography & story structure of more concrete genres, like the Western or the Gangster film (if I can remember my Science-Fiction film genre class from college correctly). The Western features cowboys, saloons, shootouts – constant, common visual cues that you’re watching a Western. A Sci-Fi film, however, could feature a time machine, or take place on a space ship, or feature a robot – any and all visuals are possible. A Gangster film almost always features the tragic rise and fall of a criminal in the urban jungle, while a Sci-Fi film could be about changing the past, or fighting aliens, or about a robot learning to be human. Science-Fiction is defined by its very diversity – any time period, any technology, any idea is possible. The only requirement is that the story address and think about that possibility.  The “what if?” of the story isn’t just a jumping off point, but the actual crux of the story.

ElysiumVSHer

So, back to 2013, and two very different films. Just a few weeks ago, I saw Spike Jonze’s her, and loved it. Absolutely loved it. A tender, beautiful love story between a man and his Artificially Intelligent computer program, and the complications that arise from that. But this Summer, I saw Neil Blomkamp’s Elysium …and there’s really nothing good I can say about it. Matt Damon does his best, but even he can’t save a severely underwritten, poorly-told, simplistic, heavy-handed action film with some robots and space ships thrown in.

Both of these films are technically Science Fiction, yet I had vastly different reactions to them. Why? Well, of course, no one is going to like every film in a single genre. Hell, not every film in a genre is even going to be good – there are probably thousands of terrible direct-to-DVD sci-fi films cluttering Redboxes across the country right now. But I think an important distinction can be made between her and Elysium that address the nature of science-fiction.  “her” is about how a man could love an AI, how an AI could love a human, and the challenges they face as a couple that cannot touch each other (as well as looking at an overall world immersed in virtual activity and communication). Elysium features a floating space station for the rich, brain chips, and fancy new weapons, but it’s about a man trying to break in to a restricted area to get healed by a magical healing machine (the film never tries to explain how it works). While her makes the technology and the “science-fiction” part of the story, Elysium uses the science-fiction setting and props to dress up an action film, and a pretty silly action film at that.

ElysiumSpaceStation
Elysium Space Station

Maybe that’s it – the fact that Elysium pretends that it’s a Science-Fiction film, but is really an action film in Sci-Fi clothing is why I hated it so much, that and the fact that it’s a poorly written, hammy over-the-top failure (such a disappointment after the terrific District 9). Good Science-Fiction takes interesting questions about technology, human nature, outer space, and seeks to explore possible answers. They can be action-packed (The Terminator) or comedic (Wall-E) or head spinning (Primer), but they have to explore possibilities in a way only Science Fiction can.

Perhaps the solution to the broadness of the Science Fiction genre is being a little bit more selective about what gets to be called “Science Fiction”. The Action-Adventure genre can have Elysium – we don’t want it. In fact, they can have Gravity too. Gravity is a tremendous film, and one of the best of the year, but nothing about it is scientifically fictitious – everything in it is real, and it takes place today. It’s not Science Fiction – it’s a survival story on a space station.

Science Fiction is a special thing – a creative space for exploring new ideas, possible technologies, unpredicted futures. If other genres want to play around in this sandbox and borrow bits and pieces, that’s fine – but the distinction of “Science Fiction” should be held only by those who truly care about and are defined by their exploration of scientific possibility.

Thoughts about the Sci-fi genre and/or the films mentioned? We’d love to hear what you think!


Conor Holt is the writer, director, and producer of multiple short films. His most recent film, A Better Life, a science-fiction drama about marriage & control, which he directed & co-wrote, played at the 2013 Fargo Film Festival and the Twin Cities Film Fest, and recently won Best Editing & Visual Effects at the St. Cloud Film Festival. He is a graduate of the Minnesota State University Moorhead Film Studies program, and currently lives in Los Angeles, working odd jobs in the film industry and volunteering at film festivals.

For more information on A Better Life, check out the Facebook page at facebook.com/ABetterLifeShortFilm. Follow Conor on Twitter.

12 thoughts on “Guest Post: Elysium, Her & The Nature of Science Fiction

  1. Thanks for the post Conor! This is brilliant and I echo a lot of your sentiments, wish I could write it as eloquently as you. You are spot on about Elysium having a weak story and it’s really more of an action film *dressed* as a sci-fi like you said. It’s kind of a missed opportunity as I think the basic premise is intriguing.

    I LOVE Her, and I appreciated it more the longer I think about it. I wrote one of the longest reviews of it, but I just had a lot to say about it. It’s definitely going to end up in my Top 5 of the year.

  2. Ted S.

    Nice write up Connor. Sci-fi is one of my favorite genres too but unfortunately Hollywood can’t seem to make a lot of good films base on the genre. I totally agree with you about Elysium, it’s basically about a selfish person who wants to stay alive, it looked great but it has nothing to say about society except that if you’re poor in the future, your life will sucks and rich people lives in heaven. Boring! I haven’t seen “HER” yet but looking forward to it.

    Curious to hear your thoughts on “classics” sci-fi films such as Blade Runner and 2001: A Space Odyssey, they’re two of my favorites. Also, check out a film called Outland starring Sean Connery if you haven’t seen it yet. It’s a sci-fi combine with western element, pretty good movie.

    Good luck in your film career pursuit!

    1. Hey Ted! Wow I hadn’t heard of Outland before? It’s nothing to do with Outlander though right? Sci-fi Western is still pretty rare, somehow I only remember Cowboys n Aliens which I heard is awful.

      1. Ted S.

        No, I think Outlander is the cheesy movie starring Jim Caviezel. Outland came out in the early 80s, I think a year or two before Connery returns to do his last Bond flick. I thought it’s a great sci-fi mix with western.

  3. I haven’t seen Her yet, so I don’t have a comment on it, really. But I quite agree on Elysium. It is neither Sci-Fi primarily nor good.

    Good analysis, Conor.

  4. So now I want to see her!
    One of my problems with Elysium was that it was about too many things. Not just a man trying to be healed (I agree, the ‘science’ of the pods wasn’t explained ) but about warfare, class distinctions, inequality, justice, big brother, universal healthcare. Like good sci-fi, taking real issues and treating them in an unreal context. I found that none was dealt with sufficiently enough however, thus the film didn’t have a real focus/purpose.

  5. Interesting post and agree that science fiction is a broad genre. Something can have a science fiction background (for example Another Earth) against which a normal story is told or that setting dominates the story (think Star Wars). I don’t think Elysium pretends to be a science fiction film, it simply is one. It just comes down to the fact if that science fiction movie (like any movie) tells a compelling story. Sure it is nice to classify movies in genres, but in the end only one thing matters: Whether a movie is worth checking out or not, no matter what the genre is.

  6. Conor Holt

    Thanks for all the comments, everyone! Everyone should definitely see ‘her’ this weekend, and comment with what you thought about it!

    Ted – Blade Runner & 2001 are 2 of my favorite Sci-Fi films, and they’re probably the 2 best ever made. Both are intelligent, thought provoking, visually striking, and historically groundbreaking. Still need to see Outland sometime.

    1. Ted S.

      Yeah, check out Outland when you get a chance, it’s pretty cheap to buy on DVD/Bluray. It’s basically a western flick set in space, it came out in the early 80s when studios were trying to cash in on the Star Wars craze. I think it failed at the box office because it didn’t have space ship battles or laser guns, LOL.

  7. Pingback: FlixChatter Review: Spike Jonze’s HER |

Join the conversation by leaving a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s